Thursday, 27 January 2011

What is badminton for? -Part 5/.

...
Whereas this can be seen in terms of Newtonian classical physics, perforce those others who may demur and claim the scientific to be of minor importance compared to the cultural context. These others insist on the priority of the narrative skeleton upon which we put the sumptuous flesh of experience. But alas, this usually reduces to contemplations of the sexual tensions in the showers, the need to dominate and humiliate and so on.

Notwithstanding the insistence of these ruined pieces of Badboiiz nature we have to ask the question;- How can the science and the culture of the Badboiiz be combined to give a rounded flavour of this whole reality that is not just descriptive? Of course we do rely on verbal discourse; but probably at the risk over-reliance of the endless litany that merely celebrates the notion that we are all a construction of selves through time.
There is a lament that the rotation of the shuttle around its axis of flight has no correlation with the ‘self system’ (More on shuttle rotation below).

I would maintain however that such proponents are the enemies of promise; we must prevent the wheels of the project from falling off -we must now listen to those who in distinction and in minority, proclaim from behind their pints - “You have to do the maths“.

No comments:

Post a Comment